I have followed HP since the late 1980s and found
them an impressive operation. The last
few years have been confusing, indeed, and their current market position has
been troubling. There’s a confluence of market
disruptors at play in the technology industry which sits poised for another one
of its massive shake outs and upheavals.
Iron-centric vendors will be the most at risk
which does not auger well for HP. We
will see the economic downdraft first in the channel, where a number of small
business entities competing in the VAR space will be snuffed out as they
struggle to transition over to a Managed Service Provider (MSP) business
model. It’s a function of lessening one’s
reliance on hardware profits and making it up on subscription-based software
and services provisioned out over the cloud.
There’s a cash-flow drain in the transition with which undercapitalized
small businesses will struggle.
Move up the food chain and the pressure on
hardware revenue and profits will begin impacting big name vendors. I will not be at all surprised to see, for
example, IBM show a period of flat or even slightly declining revenue
performance while maintaining its operating line. I say this given the solid way in which this
company has transitioned from hardware to software and services that goes back
decades.
HP has not been as nimble. The profits gleaned from printer supplies certainly have kept that company afloat for quite some time, but now the pressures appear too great. Meg Whitman essentially came out and admitted as much the other day. Consider the challenges it faces:
· 1. It
lacks a solid mobility offering
Mobility means smart phones and tablets in lieu of PCs, and HP has neither at the moment. It will come out with a Windows Tablet and will be “betting on 8” (Windows8) almost as much as Microsoft.
Mobility means smart phones and tablets in lieu of PCs, and HP has neither at the moment. It will come out with a Windows Tablet and will be “betting on 8” (Windows8) almost as much as Microsoft.
· 2. Servers
face similar threats
HP has been a major player in the server space which also faces competition from IaaS provisioners content to string together racks of generic server boards on low cost, usage-based pricing plans to end customers. Server demand will not evaporate, to be sure, but neither will it serve as a growth engine to pull a company the size of HP out of the doldrums.
HP has been a major player in the server space which also faces competition from IaaS provisioners content to string together racks of generic server boards on low cost, usage-based pricing plans to end customers. Server demand will not evaporate, to be sure, but neither will it serve as a growth engine to pull a company the size of HP out of the doldrums.
· 3. Cloud,
Software and Services drive competitive differentiation
HP simply lacks a fair amount of scale here. HP made a big bet here, however, picking up Autonomy for $10B and having EDS as a services arm, but this is not where its market reputation lies
HP simply lacks a fair amount of scale here. HP made a big bet here, however, picking up Autonomy for $10B and having EDS as a services arm, but this is not where its market reputation lies
For years HP had a well-earned reputation as the
maker of very well engineered and reliable technology products. They were viewed as a diverse manufacturer of
piece parts or components with less robust marketing or business-specific
knowledge to offer the way IBM can and does with its industry marketing/“Smarter
X” orientation. So HP’s reputation was
one for reliable products.
End customers do not want to consider product
anymore. They simply want data access
seamlessly provisioned to them. Yes,
they will have on premise hardware as necessary, but the network will increasingly
be the computer and what iron located where will process and store company data
will increasingly be deemed immaterial to the end customer. Customers will simply care less about the
iron in the utility computing model just as electric customers today do not
care about where the electricity they consume gets generated.
And that represents HP’s greatest threat. That which has been the source of their
excellent reputation simply matters less to end customers than it has in the
past. Other vendors have narrowed the performance/reliability
gap on the one hand, and customers want less and less of the product under
their control on the other.
Less competitive differentiation and less
customer importance. Ouch.
I personally cannot help but root for Hewlett
Packard in these turbulent times. I
first started tracking them as they were late shifting from 16 bit to 32 bit
minicomputer architectures. The external
market forces at play today make the necessary transition over to software and
services by HP for more daunting a challenge for the company.
No comments:
Post a Comment